This morning an article in the Idaho Statesman titled "ID applies for grant to better track students" appeared. The title does not suggest any wrong doing however some simple fact checking reveals a great deal.
From the article linked above.
[QUOTE]
The department has applied for a $6 million federal grant to help pay for the system, which will assign students a unique ID number to track their achievement and attendance through graduation or until they drop out.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
Idaho is among few states without a longitudinal data system to provide more accurate graduation rates and dropout statistics. State lawmakers gave the education department $2.5 million last year to develop a framework for the system, which is now being tested in Idaho public schools.
[/QUOTE]
This is where it gets interesting.
On January 27, 2009 I attended a conference in Boise ID sponsored by the IETA (Idaho Education Technology Association). At this conference I attended a breakout session titled "Unique Student ID general setup" which consisted of a Idaho Unique Student ID system demonstration. This system is being used by School Districts throughout the state of Idaho and is managed by the Idaho State Department of Education. The system was purchased from Lumen Software. At the beginning of the session the main speaker specifically said "I want to clear up something...there have been rumors floating around that the Idaho State Department of Education paid 2 million dollars for this system.....that is simply not true.... they paid fifty thousand dollars for this system ... I can show you a copy of the check". Now I thought this statement was rather odd until I read the Idaho Statesman article linked above and below.
ID applies for grant to better track students
Facts:
* The Idaho Department of Education was given 2.5 million dollars last year to implement a longitudinal data system.
* The Idaho Department of Education has not implemented a longitudinal data system.
* The Idaho Department of Education is testing a unique student id system that cost $50,000.
* There is no evidence that any school districts are participating in a longitudinal data system test.
* If the money is not spent on a longitudinal data system then it must be returned.
Why has the Idaho Statesman published an article that is almost completely inaccurate? It seems that they did no fact checking. It looks like a complete work of fiction.
Is a false paper trail being created to hide the money?